Some Blah Blah that are much more blah blah than any other blah blah I might have ever heard.
But before that the odd name of this site. It may be seeming like blah blah to me.
But let me tell me its not.
Ferrets are not rats or rodents. In fact they hunt rats or rodents. Its rare one find an animal who appear rodent but kill and eat rodent.
They belong to mustelide family. A family close to it is Herpestidae which include mongoose or meerkats.
Mustlide are more closely related to Dogs while Herpestitade more closely related to Cats. So they can be thought of a hybrid between cat and dog though they are all purely carnivorous.
I tried internet marketing thinking its a best way to be free both financial and psychological or anyway else imaginable.
I tried it for 8 years with some occasional success.
Yes I know I may have already anticipated my next line. It was not at all as expected and just opposite in fact.
Why?
Because I cant get what I don’t have inside? That’s a load of bull crap I say.
How can you have money or any other thing material inside.
You can only have it outside.
Sure but lot wise men have timelessly said that our all desires is to quench our basic desire which is to have no desire at all.
But does that happen when we get what we desire?
So there is no end to desire. That much is clear. But there is a desire that leads to that ultimate desire. How to pursue that desire?
Well some things are clear.
Don’t pursue materialistic desire.
Materialistic implies bodily.
Bodily includes both body and mind.
But how? Body always try to overpower me.
That’s because its necessary. Without friction there cannot be any movement.
Without movement there can be no time. Without time there can be no universe.
So there will always be two sides in the world. So one can argue why then choose this side over other.
Well because that’s the only choice I have.
Henry ford said you can have any color as long as it is black.
All other choices are illusory there is no choice at all.
Simply put if all people becomes body centric world would end. Equally true is if all becomes non body centric.
But will it ever be possible. Just imagine. Even if I try can I never become free of my senses. There are 6 sense organ 5 physical and the sixth is mind. I can try but never reach there.
So why even try?
Because I am unhappy.
Will I be happy in this case?
No But I will not be unhappy. That’s the highest state possible.
Me and my body can never be friends.
And my body include everything I have empathy/sympathy for.
Lets dig deeper shall I?
Sympathy is selfish. Its anything but love, compassion whatever. It is dependent on external feedback. Love is not.
Suffering begets suffering. If everything except my true self is body. Then how can I say that my hands or legs holds more priority.
Its binary. Either Yes or no. Not like 50 or 40 or 90 or 99.99%. because 0.01% of infinite is still infinite.
But this is all superficial. Where is the depth?
Depth lies in the fact that there is nobody except me in this world.
And I am not doing anything. I can only observe and understand which changes the very fabric of my body which then does things accordingly.
So I am never free of it. So its a non ending struggle. So there always will be two sides.
Because there always will be material and non material.
In fact the more you side ways the more you can see the other side as non living just likes rocks or sand.
As long as I have a body or atleast the illusion of it there will be two sides.
My consciousness cannot think in non dualism. That state is called thoughtlessness. In fact the very organ made for thinking is divided. Left , Right. So even if I start to think in non dualism which is not possible by the way, but lets suppose I can then the separation between me and everything else will dissolve. My body will dissolve. But me alone means there is someone that is not alone. So I will also dissolve.
This raises many interesting proposition.
Aliens- Why on earth will they come if I am the only one in this world. How can I find something that is not first of all inside myself.
If I am the only one and whole cosmos is a byproduct of my habit. Are aliens really that far from me. If I call them aliens they should not be anything like any living creature I have ever seen.
Unimaginable to be precise. Otherwise even an ant or octopus is an alien.
To start questioning about other planets I have to first question whether this planet exist or not because I am the only proof of everything.
So the thought of aliens is dualistic is its very core. That mean it is an infinitely long series of division by 2 of very universe. It has no end. I cant find aliens there. Its differentiation. I have to take the integration route.
First of all why do I want to find aliens in first place. Because this mind has this thought somehow implanted. My mind is not my own. Its amalgam of everything that I perceive as material.
Its intriguing to find someone not like this body because that will somehow be beneficial to the idea that I exist which is false. Even if I am somehow successful it should not bolster the illusion of my bodily existence. How can it do so.
By not revealing its form as that can be perceived with natural eyes.
Its bad enough that I can not completely disassociate with this body. Why would I want to increase my suffering by making it more of the same.
Jatmya is the maya that makes me not see after all effort even though I know this body and all of its 5 senses as illusion. Its the only reason I start thinking self consciously which is not the way.
Also how can I be sure that some one totally not like me be hostile or good towards me. By me I am sure I mean body. That’s what is afraid of its existence. Am I free of this thought towards those who are like me?
Time travel.
Okay so many great minds have pondered over this question of time. But most definition is cyclic that is it defines itself in terms of later which defines itself in term of former. 60 min is an hour and One hour is 60 min.
But that is a useless definition. So I should point out other definitions that deals with fundamental nature or property of time.
So Time can be thought of or broken down into two.
Chronological and Psychological.
1.)Chronological depends and runs on fixed laws. It may be relative to space but still predictable.
2.) Psychological depend on my intention.
I have experienced many times that inner clock runs very differently and depends on my experience of the world around me. And all experience is for the bodily self. No one else experience the experiences. When I feel in control time flows very fast. When not seconds feels like millennium.
I am the subject and there is an object. I change the object by thinking I control it as if me and the object are different. So in the process I change both myself and the object.
This change is psychological time. But it always leaves me dissatisfacted. Why? because I always want more no matter the state.
So let me go back to origin. If I don’t exist chronological time has no meaning.
So there is chronological future and past which depends on my existence.
And there is a present which is not the present moment per se.
But absence of the false controller. When there is no controller present, psychologically there wont exist a past or future. And same should be the case with chronological time though it never appear so.
So traveling in future would first involve awakening the false controller going to a high gravity space and returning back to original place. In fact it is not a new thing at all. When I say gravity I cant help but feel a connection between physical or body centric existence and the strength of gravity.
It looks like slowing of time or high gravity is like defying death. But if I look more closely it is just delaying it with progressively decreasing acceptance towards the very thought.
Since I cant find something that is not first present within me as per non dualism. Immortality can also be not found outside no matter how many time I slow down my time.
That’s why accumulation of mass is not an indicator of life but most of the time a fear of death. Although the basic desire is life itself.
So lets summarize. Chronological traveling in future is no big deal I do it everyday whenever I am in unaware state.
Chronological traveling in past-Well I have seen the movie where sitting in a time machine or superman revolving round the earth at speed of light makes earth time or even movement backward.
Other theory postulates worm holes, black holes etc.
Basic idea is that can I slow down time so much that it goes beyond absolute zero.
Lets imagine what should be the property of such a physicality.
Entropy will decrease with time.
Chronologically I will age forward? Why?
If moving to future means slowing time so moving to past means fastening my time. ie Increase my entropy at expense of everything else.
But its just implies aging fast. Not actually going to past times because I will ultimately die before that.
It is said that if one is not aware it recreates its past. Nothing new psychologically and may be even chronologically. So my past becomes the future.
So if I go to far enough future I may go to my past at least metaphorically.
Since psychological time depends on intention and not on any laws.
So my surrounding may be like before times but I will be more dissatisfied with lesser prospects of getting better because of illusionary senses overpowering my wisdom.
Going backward is a different case.
To really go backward chronologically I have to die.
Does absence of bodily I implies the same. Let me explore.
Bodily I is a byproduct of all things material. Keeping the mechanical function intact one cannot leave the bodily I even though it appears real. It is not. Its a machine.
Even when a machine is switched off which can be thought as analogous to sleeping. I remains because breathing, heart beat etc are still functioning. In terms of a robot it can be thought as the basic structure needed to rerun and do not decay as fast as humans in the absence of power.
Because something material cannot give rise to something non material.
So there is no distinction. It just appears so to the I.
So the non dual state is no state at all. Its an infinite per suite. One cannot.
There are only two ways to go to non dual state. Either loose consciousness or elevate it infinitely.
I do not exist independent of the body. A specific state feasible for I has to be there. So going back in time requires absence of I is suicide literally. Its a restart except of the whole universe.
To see it differently. Going in past is unavoidable. Except that the new I is not the same old I. So no past travel is not possible.
But lets do it hypothetically.
Hypothetically absence of bodily I will imply absence of all experience. So moving to non dual state and then back to dual. It will mean I will probably have memory of past/future but no concept of I.
A new I henceforth formed will not be regular I formed in womb. Because the world is now the womb for me and my sense of body will be prematurely wider. Up to what degree may depend on my memories probably.
Since I is a product of world itself destruction of I is loss of entropy of world which may compensate for the required loss of entropy of physical existence.
So yes going backward without literally entropy loss of the body is possible.
But all the theories is valid only if I can dissolve completely.
But if there is no I there is no world either. If I die the whole world dies which will be absurd. But then I does die without even trying. So trying anything will be more of the same thing. So even if I try to go to future its is more of the past if it leads to dissatisfaction in existence which it inevitably will be if the conscious desire or intention is anything but the basic desire ie, end of all desire.
All further rambling is pointless. So shut the fuck up me ferret.
If my intention is originating from incompleteness I will be more incomplete whether I go chronologically forward or backward.
Why? Since I and world are not separate.
But will psychological travel too.
The separation between I and the universe creates time. How?
I feel incomplete. I make relation with the object. In process both I and object changes. It creates time.
Thesis , Antithesis, Synthesis.
Jatmya creates a time which I have no control over but only observatory control.
Also there is nothing like present. Everything I experience is the past. The more I dwell in it the more I allow the past to re appear. How?
I am my past experience. Even my present is a past experience. But past by definition is past, gone, expired. So “I” is not in present. But “I” try to experience future based on past experience. So I recreate my past. There is a time lag even if infinitesimally small even if I try to change future based on present experience. Its not real time. In control systems If there is a delay in feedback. The output oscillates and becomes unstable if delay is large. So I can never be in control. I can however relinquish my seat as controller and let everything take care of itself and just understand.
So what I knew of past, present or future is not what I thought conventionally. There is no past or future. There is only present.
And real Present is when I am not present. By I I mean bodily I which is necessary to feel the world in its illusionary sense. Lack of illusion will not be a world of no illusion. Lack of illusion will be no world at all.
So as long as bodily I is present there is time and it always flows forward as long as I am there. When I die time dies. When another I is born another time is born.
When I say time travel. Its relative. I am imagining an environment in distant future. But future is created by me only. I am making a boundary between I and everything else and want everything to change much faster than me in forward.
So I can only change the future without literally dieing. All other fanciful imagination of cryogenic time travel etc is changing the future nothing else.
Big bang theory
The biggest mystery is what was before big bang. All rest is explainable.
Ok So The great origin it was. It is the dawn of time. So earlier to it was no time. Time is change right? Time is change because of my association with everything that appears distinct from me.
As discussed above time is not cyclic. It is linear and of fixed duration which is the duration of I. When I dies time also dies and there is only present. In time there is only past and future but no present. Soil becomes tree. Tree becomes leaves, leaves fall it becomes soil and soil again becomes tree. It is a cycle, as long as I am there in the world. If I am not there there is no world. So there is no big bang. Big bang started when I started to develop and I don’t know if there is a big bang or some other theory when I takes or took different form and it is a pointless question because it is unknowable with sensory information.
What ever theory I come up with it doesn’t solve the basic question of how something came from nothing or even how there was everything with no beginning.